Smoking History Lesson, #2: The 1500s
If anti-smokers are just after smokers “for their own good,” why have they been at it since before anyone knew it’s “bad” for you?
Read moreTag Archives: smoking ban pros and cons
Junk Science, #4: The Secondhand Smoke Fraud – Guesswork and Hearsay
There are no measurements of exposure, there is no lab work, no experiments, and never any proof.
Read moreDid You Know? #2
In 1961, nearly 70% of all males in the United States over the age of 18 were smokers. Just over a decade later, the World Health Organization decided to make them pariahs by way of “secondhand smoke,” despite having no studies to back up their claims.
Read moreGroups Behaving Badly, #2: The U.S. Surgeon General
The SG’s recommendations are partly responsible for many smoking bans throughout the U.S. It’s imperative, then, to take a closer look.
Read moreJunk Science, #3: Unfounded Scares About Secondhand Smoke
Anything is toxic or carcinogenic if the dose is large enough.
Read moreGroups Behaving Badly #1: The Pharmaceutical Connection
Anti-smoking groups like the American Cancer Society fight to restrict the freedoms of smokers using millions of dollars from pharmaceuticals–an industry whose products, overall – when taken as prescribed – kill one American every five minutes. And many are said to cause cancer!
Read moreJunk Science #1: The World Health Organization Didn’t Only Lie About COVID.
Covid is far from the first time the WHO has been engaged in a potential cover-up. The organization has numerous ties to the pharmaceutical industry, which profits from policies such as smoking bans.
Read more
FumaClub 