How many people ACTUALLY die from smoking? The answer will shock you!
Be against the 21 age limit for smoking because it’s a precedent they want to use against everyone else.
They’re so distracted in their efforts to stop you from smoking or vaping that they’ve dropped the ball on preventing a completely preventable food shortage.
Does smoking remove 6 minutes from your life?
Follow our new TikTok account!
The combatants in the war against vapers are the same entities who’ve been trying to crush smokers over the last few decades: astro-turf “health groups,” corrupt “charities,” and paid off politicians working at the behest of the pharmaceutical industry, which wants to corner the market on nicotine. This, despite the fact that pharmaceutical nicotine products
“Not only a story about the attack on tobacco users but a story about how decent Americans can be frightened, perhaps duped into accepting phony science, attacks on private property rights and rule of law.” Boy, were they right!
When you ask someone if tight restrictions on smoking are a good thing, they’ll usually say yes. When you ask why, they’ll say because it’s addictive and unhealthy. When you follow up by asking them if kids should be allowed to eat sugar, their brain breaks.
Why is it that when money’s involved, there’s always corruption? Can’t a group just be honest and trustworthy for once?
One segment of society is very familiar with the slippery slope.
Wouldn’t this look great stuck over a ‘no smoking’ sign? We’re not saying you should do that.
Any honest person looking even just a little deeper beyond the mainstream narrative would agree.
One of Britain’s top experts on the effects of smoking insists it’s fine to smoke 10 cigarettes a day, passive smoking is no problem, and the government is wasting money telling people to quit.
Photoshop. Real cost. Photoshop. Real cost. See what I’m getting at here?
Everyone should have seen this disaster coming – even before COVID.
When director Taylor Hackford’s Ray Charles biopic was released, he was attacked by the astro-turf anti-smoking flash mob.
When a group feels the need to call itself “The Truth,” you KNOW something fishy’s going on.
Netflix greenlights images of sexualized underage girls, but shuns smokers
VIDEO: Pharmaceuticals create allegedly cancer-causing products, yet are largely responsible for almost every anti-smoking and anti-vaping measure.
If anti-smokers are just after smokers “for their own good,” why have they been at it since before anyone knew it’s “bad” for you?
Though staunch anti-smokers themselves, Enstrom and Kabat were also principled, and refused to back down when it became apparent that secondhand smoke did not pose mortal danger to nonsmokers.
There are no measurements of exposure, there is no lab work, no experiments, and never any proof.
Genocide is a process. Which number are we at with smokers?
What smokers can learn from the Lancet’s Hydroxychloroquine scandal
Mask mandates eerily parallel smoking bans, which are are also top-down mandates against free choice with little to no scientific basis.
We now live in an America where the troops who waded through hell storming the beaches of Normandy to help restore liberty to Europe are not even allowed to smoke in their own private veteran’s halls. And based on phony lobbyist science, no less. How would these men have felt had they been told about the future of their country?
When it comes to health–or anything else–the CDC is the last entity you should trust.
Failures in peer review and mistakes in statistics have rendered a shocking number of scientific studies useless – or, worse, badly misleading.
Anti-smokers manufacture “urban legends” like this to influence behavior
Japan has one of the highest smoking rates on Earth–yet one of the lowest lung cancer rates, and one of the highest life expectancy rates!
Seeing an ad with an athlete (or anyone else remotely admirable) might make a smoker realize that perhaps there is nothing inferior about them after all.
Deadly products, bribery, corruption, environmental disasters, tax evasion, human rights abuses, and cover-ups: These are the people responsible for smoking bans.
U.S. taxpayers forced to give the pharmaceutical giant $2 billion dollars
Young people never die from smoking. So shouldn’t smoking be allowed for all young people and not allowed for old people? Better yet, just allow it for everyone!
Anyone following the CDC’s proclamations about smoking over the past couple of decades could have already told you they are liars.
The SG’s recommendations are partly responsible for many smoking bans throughout the U.S. It’s imperative, then, to take a closer look.
Scientific journals, health studies, health departments, hospitals, and universities are all susceptible to corruption, but now you can find out who funds them.
After defeating and surpassing its only (formerly) major rival, the tobacco industry, Big Pharma has set its sights on the rest of the country.
“Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victim my be the most oppressive… Those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.” -CS Lewis
Upon further investigation, accounting for age and sex, the researchers found smokers appeared to have had some kind of protection against the virus.
The FDA has no right to tell you or anyone else not to take supplements, smoke, or vape. They have not earned, nor do they deserve, the public’s trust.
Anything is toxic or carcinogenic if the dose is large enough.
Click for full image.
Anti-smoking groups like the American Cancer Society fight to restrict the freedoms of smokers using millions of dollars from pharmaceuticals–an industry whose products, overall – when taken as prescribed – kill one American every five minutes. And many are said to cause cancer!
Never apologize for smoking. Here’s why
These are the types of dirty little secrets you won’t hear researchers or journals discussing.
Banning cigarette ads is not only a form of censorship, but also a form of propaganda. When nobody sees people smoking in any media, they are slowly trained into thinking of it as an abnormal behavior. Abnormal behavior means “abnormal” people are the only ones who would do such a thing.
The world’s first European smoker meets the world’s first anti-smokers…
Chanel was a chain-smoking fashion pioneer who lived to be 87, about 10 years beyond even today’s current average life expectancy.
“When on occasion I’m asked by groups of aspiring writers what they should do to get on, my advice is always, emphatically, smoke. Smoke often and smoke with gusto. It’s a little known, indeed little researched, fact of literature and journalism that no non-smoker is worth reading. And writers who give up become crashing bores.” –A.A. Gill
Covid is far from the first time the WHO has been engaged in a potential cover-up. The organization has numerous ties to the pharmaceutical industry, which profits from policies such as smoking bans.
There are actually numerous little-known health benefits to smoking which have to be weighed alongside potential risks. As efforts in the 60s and 70s to warn people about the then-unknown risks of smoking turned into a frenzy to obliterate smokers from the face of the planet, the health benefits of smoking and nicotine became more and more suppressed.
I know your mother taught you please and thank you, and while I doubt she mentioned cigarettes specifically, trust me, it applies just the same.
Compared to anti-smoking groups and their financiers, so-called “big tobacco” is pretty tiny.
One of the main financiers of bar and restaurant smoking bans, as well as anti-smoking groups, knew for decades that ingredients in its talcum powder contained asbestos, which can cause cancer, according to a report by Reuters.
Is smoking really as bad for you as they say? Find out here.
Given that many credible whistleblowers have said, in effect, that the FDA works for the pharmaceutical industry, it becomes less surprising that it spends so much of its time and effort not on proper procedures, but on a continuous campaign against smoking and vaping. The pharmaceutical industry wants to dominate the nicotine market. Nicotine Replacement Therapies are a multi-billion dollar industry. Can we trust what pharmaceuticals, and the ABC cancer charities, universities, and government organizations which are funded by them, have to say about smoking?
When someone attempts to impose their will on you by saying you should quit smoking – or asking when you will quit smoking – just tell them you will as soon as THEY quit all the unhealthy and risky things THEY do.
From that point forward, constantly ask them if they’ve quit everything yet!
One thing we can almost guarantee: anti-smoking groups and “cancer charities,” which are funded by big pharma, will give the pharmaceutical industry a complete pass – for all intents and purposes, they’re paid to look the other way.
The U.S. Surgeon General says “there’s no such thing as a safer cigarette.” Doesn’t that also mean there’s no such thing as a more dangerous cigarette? So what the SG’s saying is that smoking a cigarette the size of South America is only as bad for you as a normal-size one!
The FDA’s response to cancer-causing pharmaceutical products is VERY different than how it treats tobacco: “It’s fine.”